Policy Briefing #30. Agroforestry & the draft regulations on Forest Reproductive Material and New Genomic Techniques
The draft Forest Reproductive Material Regulation fails to mention agroforestry, and the particular need for high-quality planting stock when trees are planted at wide-spacings, with less opportunity for self-thinning and improvement-thinning. We suggest that: a) every mention of “afforestation/reforestation” in the draft Regulation (pages 2, 7, 18, 11, 12, 17, 19) is replaced by “afforestation/reforestation/agroforestation”; b) a definition (new bullet) of “agroforestation” should be provided in Article 3 Para 3 – i.e. “´agroforestation´ means the establishment of high-quality trees on land which remains in agricultural use – for the purposes listed in Article 3 Para 1(a – f), and where a detailed definition of agroforestry is given in the CAP Strategic Plans of each Member State; c) Article 3 Para 1c should be reworded “restoration of forest and agroforest ecosystems”. EURAF also welcomes the provisions of the NGT Regulation, particularly when they are applied to the long list of diseases which are increasingly affecting European forests and agroforests.
Read more about EURAF’s reaction by clicking here or the image down below.
This Policy Briefing is an output from the DigitAF Project Grant agreement: 101059794. DigitAF is a consortium of 26 European and international partners committed to providing digital tools to boost Agroforestry in Europe to meet climate, biodiversity and sustainable farming goals. Views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. |